Republicans never acknowledged why there is bugdet deficit so they look at the wrong place
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewshourHeadlines/~3/LvpJldDn_AE/entitlements_12-06.html
Medicare and Social Security are not entitlements but earned benefits.
The motivation for this blog is Jon Stewart's description of Fox News during episode #17153, aired on 9/19/2012 ___________________________________________ (See entry on this blog: http://bullshitmountain.blogspot.com/2012/09/bullshit-mountain.html). It is devoted to exposing and discussing hypocrisy of anybody in public sphere, including public itself! If you feel like it, I would be more than welcome to post your contribution using the form below - thanks for your visit.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Bush Still Gets More Blame for Economy Than Obama
I think it is actually positive. American public may not believe in evolution but they sure remember who brought on them the great recession.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/127472/bush-gets-more-blame-economy-obama.aspx
http://www.gallup.com/poll/155177/americans-blame-bush-obama-bad-economy.aspx
http://www.gallup.com/poll/127472/bush-gets-more-blame-economy-obama.aspx
http://www.gallup.com/poll/155177/americans-blame-bush-obama-bad-economy.aspx
Monday, November 12, 2012
Fwd: Frum: GOPers 'have been fleeced'
via POLITICO - TOP Stories by <a href="http://www.politico.com/reporters/DylanByers.html" rel="nofollow">DYLAN BYERS</a> on 11/9/12
The columnist argues that Republicans have been lied to by a "conservative entertainment complex."
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Does cutting taxes increase growth? No clear evidence ....
Congressional Research Service: Taxes and the Economy: An Economic Analysis of the Top Tax Rates Since 1945 (pdf)
Figure 1. Average Tax Rates for the Highest-Income Taxpayers, 1945-2009
Figure 2. Top Marginal Tax Rate and Top Capital Gains Tax Rate, 1945-2010
Figure 4. Labor Productivity Growth Rates and the Top Tax Rates, 1945-2010
Figure 5. Real Per Capita GDP Growth Rate and the Top Tax Rates, 1945-2010.
=============
From www.maddowblog.com:
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/11/02/14889448-the-report-mitch-mcconnell-doesnt-want-you-to-see?lite
From Rachel Maddow - don't like results of report, kill it!
CBO: http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/11/09/15053167-cbo-higher-taxes-on-rich-wont-harm-economy?lite
Figure 1. Average Tax Rates for the Highest-Income Taxpayers, 1945-2009
Figure 2. Top Marginal Tax Rate and Top Capital Gains Tax Rate, 1945-2010
Figure 4. Labor Productivity Growth Rates and the Top Tax Rates, 1945-2010
Figure 5. Real Per Capita GDP Growth Rate and the Top Tax Rates, 1945-2010.
=============
From www.maddowblog.com:
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/11/02/14889448-the-report-mitch-mcconnell-doesnt-want-you-to-see?lite
From Rachel Maddow - don't like results of report, kill it!
CBO: http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/11/09/15053167-cbo-higher-taxes-on-rich-wont-harm-economy?lite
CBO: higher taxes on rich won't harm economy
Just yesterday, as talks over taxes and spending grew a little louder in Washington, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) cited an "independent" report that found tax increases on the wealthy would "cost our economy more than 700,000 jobs."
The argument, not surprisingly, was debunked months ago. But the rhetoric raises a worthwhile question: what would happen if a bipartisan agreement fails to materialize, and tax increases automatically kick in on Jan. 1?
Yesterday, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reported the looming tax hikes and spending cuts would undermine the economy in 2013, but the "least harmful component of the coming fiscal consolidation is precisely what Democrats are demanding: the expiration of the Bush tax cuts for high earners."
Maybe Republicans will try to suppress this, too?
The argument, not surprisingly, was debunked months ago. But the rhetoric raises a worthwhile question: what would happen if a bipartisan agreement fails to materialize, and tax increases automatically kick in on Jan. 1?
Yesterday, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reported the looming tax hikes and spending cuts would undermine the economy in 2013, but the "least harmful component of the coming fiscal consolidation is precisely what Democrats are demanding: the expiration of the Bush tax cuts for high earners."
CBO doesn't examine the top bracket Bush tax cuts directly. But it does look at two competing scenarios: One where all of the expiring tax cuts except for the payroll tax cut are extended; another where all of the expiring tax cuts except for the payroll tax cut and the Bush tax cuts for top earners are extended.So, according to the CBO, the Democratic priorities do more to help the economy, and the Republican priorities do less. The 700,000 figure cited by the House Speaker has no basis in reality at all.
The former, CBO says, would increase employment by 1.8 million full time equivalent employees in 2013 relative to allowing everything to lapse. The latter would increase employment by 1.6 million. The difference, 200,000 full time equivalent jobs, is attributable to the expiration of the top bracket Bush tax cuts alone.
By comparison, other layers of the fiscal cliff save less money and have far greater economic consequences. Failing to extend the expiring payroll tax cut and expiring emergency unemployment benefits through 2014 would cost the economy about 800,000 jobs, according to CBO. The two halves of the sequester -- the defense cuts and the domestic cuts -- would each cost the economy about 400,000 full time equivalent jobs.
Maybe Republicans will try to suppress this, too?
Friday, November 9, 2012
Some voters just just can't get over the truth ....
Well, I am afraid you cry by yourself, or with other BMN (Bullshit Mountain Nation) citizens. The America that you refer to no longer exist, or maybe it never existed.
- "Democrat party voted God out" ... I want to remind you about separation of religion and state. Political party by definition should be non-religious. It does not mean that members cannot be religious, but they practice religion in their private lives and not in public sphere.
- "In the Good vs. Evil battle...today...Evil won." Fair enough. Then I guess it was probably better for republicans to pray than vote. After all you cannot vote Evil out of existence, it will still be there, even after elections.
- "Thanks a lot Christians, for not showing up. You disgust me." If it is makes democrats even for abandoning God, I guess by the same criteria you must call your self evil by abandoning fellow Christians. You see, they showed up in great numbers, but there is not enough of them anymore.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/victoria-jackson-obama-election-crying-america-died_n_2088257.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular#slide=1193063
Victoria Jackson hasn't exactly been a beacon of rational
political analysis, but her post-election meltdown on Twitter may take
the cake. After Barack Obama was declared the winner, the former "SNL"
castmember proclaimed that America had "died."
For context, Jackson is the actress who proclaimed that she would have a baby if impregnated through rape, uncovered a "secret, underground group" of Hollywood Republicans and said gay marriage would "make God mad."
But we digress. Here's Jackson (via an unverified Twitter account) on the outcome of the 2012 presidential election:
@vicjackshow
Victoria Jackson
@vicjackshow
Victoria Jackson
@vicjackshow
Victoria Jackson
@vicjackshow
Victoria Jackson
@vicjackshow
Victoria Jackson
And, to cap things off:
@vicjackshow
Victoria Jackson
UPDATE: There you have it.
@vicjackshow
Victoria Jackson
- "Democrat party voted God out" ... I want to remind you about separation of religion and state. Political party by definition should be non-religious. It does not mean that members cannot be religious, but they practice religion in their private lives and not in public sphere.
- "In the Good vs. Evil battle...today...Evil won." Fair enough. Then I guess it was probably better for republicans to pray than vote. After all you cannot vote Evil out of existence, it will still be there, even after elections.
- "Thanks a lot Christians, for not showing up. You disgust me." If it is makes democrats even for abandoning God, I guess by the same criteria you must call your self evil by abandoning fellow Christians. You see, they showed up in great numbers, but there is not enough of them anymore.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/victoria-jackson-obama-election-crying-america-died_n_2088257.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular#slide=1193063
Victoria Jackson On Obama's Win: 'I Can't Stop Crying, America Died'
Posted: 11/07/2012 11:10 am EST Updated: 11/08/2012 5:14 pm EST
Follow:
For context, Jackson is the actress who proclaimed that she would have a baby if impregnated through rape, uncovered a "secret, underground group" of Hollywood Republicans and said gay marriage would "make God mad."
But we digress. Here's Jackson (via an unverified Twitter account) on the outcome of the 2012 presidential election:
Victoria Jackson
I can't stop crying.
Victoria Jackson
America died.
Victoria Jackson
I can't stop crying. America died.
Victoria Jackson
The Democrat party who voted God out of their platform and adopted Romans 1 as their platform won. In the Good... http://t.co/ipm6BdRi
Victoria Jackson
The Democrat Party voted God out and replaced Him with Romans 1. In the Good vs. Evil battle...today...Evil won.
And, to cap things off:
Victoria Jackson
Thanks a lot Christians, for not showing up. You disgust me.
Victoria Jackson
Victoria Jackson On Obama's Win: 'I Can't Stop Crying, America Died' http://t.co/JKtAiztn via @HuffPostEnt - "accurately reported" VJ
Kilmeade on Sandy voters: America is ‘the shallowest country in the history of man’
Even more evidence that Bullshit Mountain people live in parallel universe. The fact that most voters still blamed Bush for the slow recovery is in my mind evidence that there is still enough thinking people this country. But that phrase that they used, actually, perfectly fits the description of the network: Fox & Friends, the shallowest Show in the history of media!!!!!
guys ... watch your own show and learn ... http://video.foxnews.com/v/1952906324001/was-it-the-economy-stupid/
=========
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/07/kilmeade-on-sandy-voters-america-is-the-shallowest-country-in-the-history-of-man/
Fox News co-host Brian Kilmeade on Wednesday complained that the United States was the “shallowest country in the history of man” because exit polls showed that people considered Hurricane Sandy an important factor in the presidential race.
On the morning after President Barack Obama won re-election, Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy noted that Hurricane Sandy had been the “October surprise,” with 42 percent of people saying that the storm response was an important issue and 15 percent saying it was the most important issue.
“I can’t believe those numbers,” co-host Gretchen Carlson said, throwing up her arms.
“Then we are the shallowest country in the history of man,” Kilmeade concluded. “One photo op [of President Obama] walking over a two-by-four and all the sudden he’s handling a storm, which by the way, hasn’t been handled well!”
Watch this video from Fox News’ Fox & Friends via Media Matters, broadcast Nov. 7, 2012.
http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/11/07/kilmeade-on-voters-approving-of-obamas-response/191199
guys ... watch your own show and learn ... http://video.foxnews.com/v/1952906324001/was-it-the-economy-stupid/
=========
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/07/kilmeade-on-sandy-voters-america-is-the-shallowest-country-in-the-history-of-man/
Fox News co-host Brian Kilmeade on Wednesday complained that the United States was the “shallowest country in the history of man” because exit polls showed that people considered Hurricane Sandy an important factor in the presidential race.
On the morning after President Barack Obama won re-election, Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy noted that Hurricane Sandy had been the “October surprise,” with 42 percent of people saying that the storm response was an important issue and 15 percent saying it was the most important issue.
“I can’t believe those numbers,” co-host Gretchen Carlson said, throwing up her arms.
“Then we are the shallowest country in the history of man,” Kilmeade concluded. “One photo op [of President Obama] walking over a two-by-four and all the sudden he’s handling a storm, which by the way, hasn’t been handled well!”
Watch this video from Fox News’ Fox & Friends via Media Matters, broadcast Nov. 7, 2012.
http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/11/07/kilmeade-on-voters-approving-of-obamas-response/191199
Some interesting interaction on Fox & Friends ...
Fox And Friends Tricked By 'Former Obama Supporter'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CbXdYojkQQ
Gretchen Carlson Walks Off Fox And Friends
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&NR=1&v=z_vqfRvcjrs
Thursday, November 8, 2012
A graphic description of BS on Bullshit Mountain from DREGstudios! Thanks for your submission!!!
Submitted by dregstudiosart:
"The talking heads guarding the inhabitants of Bullsh*t Mountain from rejoining the world of the sane just won't budge an inch will they? Fox News is a propaganda machine which dumbs down America by the day through disinformation and their slanted agendas. See their anchors spewing forth feces from their mouths in my visual homage to the network on my artist’s blog at
http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-fox-news-scylla-guardian-of-bullsht.html"
"The talking heads guarding the inhabitants of Bullsh*t Mountain from rejoining the world of the sane just won't budge an inch will they? Fox News is a propaganda machine which dumbs down America by the day through disinformation and their slanted agendas. See their anchors spewing forth feces from their mouths in my visual homage to the network on my artist’s blog at
http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-fox-news-scylla-guardian-of-bullsht.html"
Nice summary of elections 2012 by Rachel Maddow
... start at 9:20 but from 12:50 it is Bullshit Mountain at its best - enjoy!
\
\
Elections in Florida ...
The interesting thing is that if you make voting so hard to vote on the election day, your people will have hard time too! So they may have actually hurt themselves ...
----------------
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/08/florida-s-messy-democracy.html
http://news.yahoo.com/election-over-final-florida-results-still-not-082709587.html
http://www.ibtimes.com/florida-election-results-delay-no-accident-865326
BY Jeremy B. White | November 08 2012 1:44 PM
It’s easy to laugh at Florida’s seemingly terminal inability to conduct a smooth election. But make no mistake: The delays, and the battles over absentee and provisional ballots, do not occur by accident. President Obama, whose Justice Department was kept busy this year challenging a raft of new state laws making it more difficult to vote, knows it.
Florida has attributed the difficulties this year to a late surge of more than 50,000 absentee ballots. But critics say that Florida's new voting law also played a role.
That law, one of the toughest and most controversial in the nation, was one of many new voting restrictions put in place since 2010 by almost invariably Republican state legislatures. A federal judge blocked the Florida law's restrictions on voter registration in August, calling the new rules “harsh and impractical.”
Left in place was a provision cutting back the number of early voting days from 14 to eight, contributing to long waits -- as much as 6 or 7 hours in Miami Dade County and 3 to 4 hours elsewhere -- that Florida League of Women Voters President Deirdre Macnab called “unacceptable delays, worse than many third world countries.”
Voters in Florida also had to contend with the longest ballot in state history, a document that spans multiple pages. The new law also requires voters who move to a different county to obtain provisional ballots, which take longer to process.
The silver lining is that booming turnout has also contributed to lengthy lines. But Macnab noted that potential voters who had to work or care for their children were likely deterred by the long wait.
“Those people were really unfairly treated by these laws,” Macnab said.
That this election was decided without Florida is both a testament to the country’s shifting demographic map and a relief to anyone nervous about a disaster reminiscent of 2000. There is another parallel, though: The 2000 election was marred by revelations that a private firm tasked with removing ineligible felons from Florida’s voting rolls mistakenly disenfranchised legitimate voters.
Critics saw echoes of that in Florida Gov. Rick Scott’s push to purge ineligible noncitizens from the rolls. Sen. Ben Nelson, a Democrat, drew a comparison between the two in a letter to Scott and warned that “attempts to purge the voter roll so soon after signing one of the nation’s most controversial voting laws raises concern, especially among young and minority voters.”
County election supervisors balked when they received preliminary lists of ineligible voters that were riddled with errors. Legitimate voters identified as ineligible had become naturalized citizens, or were mistaken for someone else with a similar name. Florida suspended the purge until it got access to a federal database; ultimately, the number of names shrank from an ostensible 180,000 to around 200.
============================
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/09/rick-scott-early-voting_n_2101566.html?1352483868
Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) is standing by his decision not
to extend early voting hours, despite the fact that some voters said
they waited as long as nine hours to cast a ballot.
"Well I'm very comfortable that the right thing happened," he told WKMG Orlando while speaking with reporters on Thursday night. "We had 4.4 million people vote."
The WXMG reporter tried to follow up again and ask whether hours should have been extended, but a member of Scott's staff appeared to end the press conference. When Scott was asked again while walking with reporters, he repeated his answer.
A major reason for Florida's chaotic early voting process was that last year, the state's GOP-controlled legislature shortened early voting days from 14 to eight. Long lines were reported across the state, with one polling place closing as late as 1 a.m. Sunday morning. In a sudden move, the Miami-Dade elections department allowed voters to cast in-person absentee ballots on Sunday afternoon, but closed temporarily because it could not meet demand.
Former Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican-turned-independent, accused Scott of "voter suppression" for refusing to extend early voting hours, and said Scott should have extended hours like he did in 2008 when he was governor.
Things weren't any better on Election Day, as people waited in lines for up to six hours in Miami-Dade County. Voting ended in the county at around 1:30 a.m. Wednesday.
As of Friday afternoon, Florida still has not been called for President Barack Obama or Mitt Romney, though Obama has a slight lead in votes. Romney conceded the state on Thursday.
----------------
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/08/florida-s-messy-democracy.html
http://news.yahoo.com/election-over-final-florida-results-still-not-082709587.html
http://www.ibtimes.com/florida-election-results-delay-no-accident-865326
BY Jeremy B. White | November 08 2012 1:44 PM
Messy elections in Florida have a groan-inducing familiarity to
them at this point. This year’s unfolding debacle even got an allusion
-- and a roaring response -- in President Obama’s victory speech on
Election Night.
“I want to thank every American who participated in this election, whether you voted for the very first time or waited in line for a very long time,” Obama said, his second term assured but Florida’s outcome still uncertain.
He paused for effect. “By the way, we have to fix that.”“I want to thank every American who participated in this election, whether you voted for the very first time or waited in line for a very long time,” Obama said, his second term assured but Florida’s outcome still uncertain.
It’s easy to laugh at Florida’s seemingly terminal inability to conduct a smooth election. But make no mistake: The delays, and the battles over absentee and provisional ballots, do not occur by accident. President Obama, whose Justice Department was kept busy this year challenging a raft of new state laws making it more difficult to vote, knows it.
Florida has attributed the difficulties this year to a late surge of more than 50,000 absentee ballots. But critics say that Florida's new voting law also played a role.
That law, one of the toughest and most controversial in the nation, was one of many new voting restrictions put in place since 2010 by almost invariably Republican state legislatures. A federal judge blocked the Florida law's restrictions on voter registration in August, calling the new rules “harsh and impractical.”
Left in place was a provision cutting back the number of early voting days from 14 to eight, contributing to long waits -- as much as 6 or 7 hours in Miami Dade County and 3 to 4 hours elsewhere -- that Florida League of Women Voters President Deirdre Macnab called “unacceptable delays, worse than many third world countries.”
Voters in Florida also had to contend with the longest ballot in state history, a document that spans multiple pages. The new law also requires voters who move to a different county to obtain provisional ballots, which take longer to process.
The silver lining is that booming turnout has also contributed to lengthy lines. But Macnab noted that potential voters who had to work or care for their children were likely deterred by the long wait.
“Those people were really unfairly treated by these laws,” Macnab said.
That this election was decided without Florida is both a testament to the country’s shifting demographic map and a relief to anyone nervous about a disaster reminiscent of 2000. There is another parallel, though: The 2000 election was marred by revelations that a private firm tasked with removing ineligible felons from Florida’s voting rolls mistakenly disenfranchised legitimate voters.
Critics saw echoes of that in Florida Gov. Rick Scott’s push to purge ineligible noncitizens from the rolls. Sen. Ben Nelson, a Democrat, drew a comparison between the two in a letter to Scott and warned that “attempts to purge the voter roll so soon after signing one of the nation’s most controversial voting laws raises concern, especially among young and minority voters.”
County election supervisors balked when they received preliminary lists of ineligible voters that were riddled with errors. Legitimate voters identified as ineligible had become naturalized citizens, or were mistaken for someone else with a similar name. Florida suspended the purge until it got access to a federal database; ultimately, the number of names shrank from an ostensible 180,000 to around 200.
============================
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/09/rick-scott-early-voting_n_2101566.html?1352483868
Rick Scott On Decision Not To Extend Early Voting: 'The Right Thing Happened'
The Huffington Post
|
By Luke Johnson
Posted: 11/09/2012 12:55 pm EST Updated: 11/09/2012 3:30 pm EST
Follow:
"Well I'm very comfortable that the right thing happened," he told WKMG Orlando while speaking with reporters on Thursday night. "We had 4.4 million people vote."
The WXMG reporter tried to follow up again and ask whether hours should have been extended, but a member of Scott's staff appeared to end the press conference. When Scott was asked again while walking with reporters, he repeated his answer.
A major reason for Florida's chaotic early voting process was that last year, the state's GOP-controlled legislature shortened early voting days from 14 to eight. Long lines were reported across the state, with one polling place closing as late as 1 a.m. Sunday morning. In a sudden move, the Miami-Dade elections department allowed voters to cast in-person absentee ballots on Sunday afternoon, but closed temporarily because it could not meet demand.
Former Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican-turned-independent, accused Scott of "voter suppression" for refusing to extend early voting hours, and said Scott should have extended hours like he did in 2008 when he was governor.
Things weren't any better on Election Day, as people waited in lines for up to six hours in Miami-Dade County. Voting ended in the county at around 1:30 a.m. Wednesday.
As of Friday afternoon, Florida still has not been called for President Barack Obama or Mitt Romney, though Obama has a slight lead in votes. Romney conceded the state on Thursday.
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Obama win puzzling?
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/startling_puzzle_of_second_chance_cxxElURqa4qJcemaCaLjII
Startling puzzle of O’s second chance
- By MICHAEL GOODWIN
- Last Updated: 7:45 AM, November 7, 2012
- Posted: 3:00 AM, November 7, 2012
Michael Goodwin
- he pulled unemployment from almost 10% to about 7.9
Go figure. I’ll always be proud of my country, but Obama’s victory defies political logic and economic reality.
- Regan had similar unemployment but the trend mattered.
It was a stunning personal triumph for a president who was ripe for a downfall.
Now comes the hard part. The presidency is a singular institution in our democracy, and Obama too often showed himself unable to bear its unique burdens in the last four years.
He set a partisan tone right out of the gate when, in a showdown over the stimulus, he rejected Republican ideas and declared, “I won.”
- by the standard, how would describle Mitch Michonnels statement that his only agenda is to make Obama one term president?
It was a moment of chest-thumping bravado that helped poison the well.
- Guess what, most voters still blame Bush for it? And actually, right so. Do you really believe that if Bush were in office during these four years we would be where we are now? The guy had bad economic record even before Great Recession.
His foreign policy is stuck between dithering and dishonesty, and, counter to his self-aggrandizing promises, the world doesn’t love us more because he is at the helm.
- depends what is the objective of the foreign policy. Is it the outcomes or the style? If he does it in a passive way, leads from behind, so be it! He killed Bin Laden without inviding any country with the help of Navy seals, deposed of Kadaffi without single injury / loss of life . In other words, if optics are bad, but he accomplishes his goals cheaply without loss of american life, so what? Isn't every single american live worth more than US looking strong and dominant?
- As of death of Ambassador Stevens - how about killing of Marines during Regan presidency? If we gave Regan a pass, why we cannot give Obama a pass?
The facts of the state of our union, then, do not explain last night’s results. Nor is it sufficient or fair to say Mitt Romney lost an election he should have won.
Yes, Romney made mistakes, chiefly being too timid for too long. But he proved to be a perfectly fine candidate down the stretch, performed brilliantly in the first debate and surged into the lead in many national polls.
- mind you, it was because of multiple lies and changes of positions. He did not offer that he will send everybody Christmas Card this year but if that was politically beneficially you can be sure he would have promised it!
But he could never put together a clear path to 270 electoral votes, coming tantalizingly close but failing to make the final sale in too many swing states.
- one word: demographics.
So give the devil his due.
- remember that it was republican party who demonized him: a lot of Republicans still believe he is Muslim and not born as American. So he is created "devil" ... on fox news network.
Obama wins a second term when gravity says he shouldn’t have. He campaigned from beginning to end with grit and more determination than message.
He and associated groups spent over $100 million in TV ads attacking Romney’s character and tenure at Bain Capital. But Obama did not win because he destroyed Romney or because a majority believes in his agenda. He won because enough voters still believe in him with a quasi religious fervor, making the actual content of many of his policies largely irrelevant to them.
- I think it is still better than Republicans supporting people who think that women have some magical way to stop becoming pregnant when rapped (see Tod Aikin), or that there is something like a "forceable rape" (see Paul Ryan). So maybe it is better to have faith in something than be ignorant facts and science. But ignorance may be a bliss so I do not blame people for it.
Strangely transfixed by his remote and haughty aura, they believe that, even without a real coherent economic plan, life will somehow get better for them if only they follow him.
- on the other hand, can you or anybody explain Romeny's economic plan? How his numbers added up? I understand that there are many scenarios, so let's discuss the best possibility that Romney though will be able to get?
For others, his “likability” edge made up for Romney’s advantage on the all-important economic issues. Life’s not fair, and the idea that likability trumps competence, in the Oval Office no less, strikes me as absurd, yet there it is in 21st century America.
- life is surely not fair, but in the same way Kerry lost to Bush in 2004: most people remember Kerry as flip-flopper without core who would not be strong enough to defend america. I think he was much superior candidae than Bush, true war Veteran and skilled politician. Well, you win some and you loose some. I think Bush in 2004 had a much bigger challenge with two wars and downward trend in the economy and yet he won.
- how do we know that Romney is competent? His campaign was worse than Obama's, especially he organization to get the votes, so in this respect in terms of managing large group of people, giving them direction, and motivating them, I think Obama was clearly more competent. And isn't it what we expect from the president?
Of course, Obama did have a message for those who feel left out of the American dream. He told them they had been cheated, that the nation was rigged against them and that he would soak the rich and redistribute their wealth. The first term proved he meant it, with a surge in disability benefits, food stamps, bailouts and class warfare, so we’re likely to get more of the same
- actually, increase in welfare benefits is cyclical and corresponds to recessions. It would have happened under any president. It is a valid question about the degree though.
It’s not a happy prospect or even a mandate, but we shall see if the president can work with the Republican House to change the nation’s course.
- so let's flip it - if Romney would win by a small margin, would that be a happy prospect and a mandate? These are the rules both candidates agreed upon, so now questioning them is quite pointless.
He rarely did in the first term, and that is a luxury he no longer enjoys. He now must be president instead of just running for the office.
The challenges are numerous and urgent. Our nation is treading water, at home and abroad. Decline is not inevitable, but neither is it a given that we will get our mojo back.
Despite his many talents, Obama showed no talent for uniting and moving the country forward in his first term. He gets another chance and, frankly, I would be surprised if he does much better this time.
Happily surprised, absolutely, but still surprised.
- I hope you know the saying: you need TWO to tango. So before blaming Obama, we need to ask if the other side was cooperative. Well, how many times House passed the same bill to repeal Obamacare? They knew it goes nowhere, they knew it will lead to nothing, and they never even condider compromise. I think it is exhibit one that House was so stuck that was steping on the toes of President Obama when they tried to dance political tango.
mgoodwin@nypost.com
Dick Morris Explains Why His Landslide Prediction Was Wrong
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/11/07/dick_morris_explains_why_his_landslide_prediction_was_wrong.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Kpbln_FmOCc
... at least some honesty.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Kpbln_FmOCc
... at least some honesty.
Obama win means there are more "takers" than "makers"
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/11/07/coulter_ingraham_debate_how_romney_lost_the_election.html
Nevada has none of the above
http://www.cbsnews.com/election-results-2012/state.shtml?state=NV
52%
B. Obama*
46%
M. Romney
| Race | Democrat | Republican | Others |
|
Nevada 1,884 of 1,912 reporting |
B. Obama* (D) 52% / 528,801 |
M. Romney (R) 46% / 462,422 |
undefined. None (ND) 1% / 5,753 |
Bill O'Relliy - - the takers won!!! They want stuff from "traditional" white voters
Karl Rowe vs Fox News
Karl Rove vs. Fox News
from ABC News: Politics
Forget Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. The most exciting matchup of the night was between Karl Rove
and his employer, Fox News. A little after 11 p.m., Fox News and every
other news outlet called the presidential race for Obama. Rove, the mastermind of George...Karl Rove vs. Michael Barone On Calling Ohio For Obama
Karl Rove
argues with Michael Barone and FOX News' decision, along with all major
news outlets, to call Ohio and the race for President Obama.
-----------
What is the name for a guy like Karl Rowe? Does he live on a different planet?
search youtube: carl rove vs foxnews
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/fox-news-election-coverage_n_2085962.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUtneL407VA
Fox News, Karl Rove Argue With Fox About Whether Obama Won Ohio
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SaPcp4PGdU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQLV7nqD3CA
Fox News, Karl Rove Argue Over The Outcome In Ohio
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnauFCqf2jI
Comment about Carl Rove
Rachel Maddow slams the kardinal Rove for not accepting reality
Awakard moment: http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/11/07/164586847/video-an-awkward-moment-as-karl-rove-objects-to-foxs-ohio-call?ft=1&f=1001
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJg3z5c93zU
VIDEO: An Awkward Moment, As Karl Rove Objects To Fox's Ohio Call
by Eyder Peralta
If you were plugged into the polls, odds are nothing really surprised you about last night.
That's why one of the most dramatic moments of night had to be when GOP strategist and major fundraiser Karl Rove threw a bomb in the middle of the Fox News broadcast.
Shortly after Fox News became one of the first to call Ohio for the president, Rove chastised its "decision desk."
"This is premature," Rove said, adding later that he'd be "very cautious about intruding in this process."
Here's the video; the awkwardness begins at around 3:51:
As NPR's David Folkenflik wrote earlier today,
Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly tried hard to convince Rove that the
network's analysts had found no plausible way for Romney to overcome his
deficit.
David reports:
That's why one of the most dramatic moments of night had to be when GOP strategist and major fundraiser Karl Rove threw a bomb in the middle of the Fox News broadcast.
Shortly after Fox News became one of the first to call Ohio for the president, Rove chastised its "decision desk."
"This is premature," Rove said, adding later that he'd be "very cautious about intruding in this process."
Here's the video; the awkwardness begins at around 3:51:
YouTube
David reports:
"Even as more results continued streaming in, Rove did it again. At 11:40 p.m., he was still at it — reciting county after county, "and then there are cats and dogs elsewhere that add up to another 120,000 votes." Kelly and Baier sought to provide a check but listened sagely to Rove, who is not just a chief political analyst for Fox and a columnist for its sibling newspaper, the Wall Street Journal, but also a leader of one of the major outside political committees spending tens of millions to defeat Obama and other Democrats.Of course, one of the big questions that will be answered in the coming months is what will become of Rove's outsized influence on GOP politics. Remember Rove is the man behind American Crossroads, the most influential and well-heeled super PAC on the Republican side. After his predictions didn't come true, will his big donors shy away from him? Or will he continue his decades of influence over the party?
"Having lost the argument — not to mention his call that predicted for Romney an edge over Obama in the electoral college of about 30 electoral college votes — Rove made clear that the president's victory carried little weight.
"'He has blown the last two years — he's played small ball,' Rove said around 12:40 a.m. Wednesday. 'This does not bode well for the future. ... He may have won the battle but lost the war.'"
---> but Obama win is better than 2004 Bush win!!!!!!!!!
--------------
Fox News Announces Re-Election Win of President Barack Obama - 11/06/12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHAHgXtE9SU
Fox News Election Coverage: Questions Turn From President Obama's Victory To 2nd Term Mandate (VIDEO)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/fox-news-election-coverage_n_2085962.html
=====================
Other links:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/07/andrew-sullivan-tells-stephen-colbert-karl-roves-head-just-exploded/
http://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-ohio-2012-11
http://www.businessinsider.com/karl-roves-historically-colossal-waste-of-money-2012-11
http://www.businessinsider.com/fox-megan-kelly-on-karl-rove-projections-2012-11
http://americablog.com/2012/11/must-watch-video-karl-rove-melts-down-on-fox.html
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/11/06/fox-news-decision-desk-stands-by-call-that-obama-will-carry-ohio/
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/11/06/karl-rove-questions-ohio-call-for-obama-electoral-victory/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/06/fox-news-argues-obama-ohio_n_2085817.html
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/now-with-alex-wagner/49728394/
Explanation by Carl: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83500.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/11/06/karl_rove_vs_michael_barone_on_calling_election_for_obama.html
http://news.yahoo.com/despite-quibble-republican-election-guru-ohio-went-obama-100837202.html
=====================
.... other interesting statements during election night
Bill O Reilly 'The White Establishment Is Now The Minority' Fox News Election Night 2012
R. Donahue (Don) Peebles on Varney & Co. Election Day 2012 Discussing the Important Issues
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
